After I caught the story below that talks about Texas S.B. 63 which allows for vaccines without parental consent, I started digging around and doing a bit more research into this bill & its sponsor. It took me less than half an hour to track down Jane Nelson’s membership in The American Legislative Exchange Council. Not only is she a supporting member; she is an active member that sits on ALEC’s…*drum roll please* Health & Human Services Taskforce.
Wonders never cease, right?
Even more shocking is the fact that some of Nelson’s largest campaign contributors are pharmaceutical and medical industries…*Gasp* whoever could imagine a politrickster pushing a corporate agenda, eh?
(NaturalNews) “If you thought the so-called “great state” of Texas was a bastion of freedom, liberty, and minimal government intrusion, think again. Efforts are currently in the works in the form of two new Senate bills to seize parental sovereignty rights and allow minors living in the Lone Star State to consent to vaccinations.
Senate Bill 63, entitled “Relating to consent to the immunization of certain children,” would allow minors to consent to vaccinations without their parents’ permission, violating existing Texas statutes that prohibit such action. Sponsored by Senator Jane Nelson, a Republican from Texas’ District 12 near Dallas, S.B. 63 is a direct affront to the rights of parents to govern the vaccination choices of their children.”
Full Story On Natural News
AUTHOR’S / SPONSOR’S STATEMENT OF INTENT
“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends “cocooning” as a strategy to protect babies from vaccine-preventable diseases in the first months of life. This entails vaccinating those in close contact with the infant, especially their parents and caregivers. Unborn children receive disease immunity through vaccines obtained by their mothers during pregnancy.
Currently, minor parents may consent to medical treatment, including immunizations, for their children. However, they may not consent to their own immunizations. Pregnant minors are also not currently allowed to consent to their own immunizations. S.B. 63 is intended to better protect unborn children and infants from vaccine-preventable diseases by allowing their parents to more easily access immunizations. Specifically, this bill allows pregnant minors or minor parents with custody of children to consent to their own immunizations.
As proposed, S.B. 63 amends current law relating to consent to the immunization of certain children.
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Subchapter B, Chapter 32, Family Code, by adding Section 32.1011, as follows:
Sec. 32.1011. CONSENT TO IMMUNIZATION BY CHILD. (a) Authorizes a child, notwithstanding Section 32.003 (Consent to Treatment by Child) or 32.101 (Who May Consent to Immunization of Child), to consent to the child’s own immunization if the child is pregnant or is the parent of a child and has actual custody of that child.
(b) Requires that consent to immunization under this section meet the requirements of Section 32.002(a) (relating to the requirement that consent to medical treatment be in writing, among other requirements).
(c) Provides that consent by a child to immunization under this section is not subject to disaffirmance because of minority.
(d) Authorizes a health care provider or facility to rely on the written statement of the child containing the grounds on which the child has capacity to consent to the child’s immunization under this section.
(e) Provides that to the extent of any conflict between this section and Section 32.003, this section controls.
SECTION 2. Effective date: upon passage or September 1, 2013.
The bill’s sponsor, Jane Nelson, raised a total of $677,298 in campaign contributions in 2010.
Below are Nelson’s top 5 campaign contributors in the 2010 election:
|Perry, Bob J.
|Texas Medical Association
|Texans for Lawsuit Reform
|Texas Pharmacy Association
|Texas Association of Realtors